Legal Opinion
Cerutti v. FRITO LAY, INC.
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Decided March 28, 2011No. Civil Action 09-22PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
CONTI, District Judge.
I. Introduction
Pending before the court is a motion for partial summary judgment (“Motion”) (ECF No. 26), filed by defendant Frito-Lay, Inc. (“defendant” or “Frito-Lay”) with respect to claims filed by plaintiffs Nancy Cerutti (“Cerutti”), James Coffman, John Constabile, Matthew Donaldson, Anthony Georgiana, Donald McKnight, Linda Massucci, Michael Massucci, Shaun Christopher, and John Arison (collectively, “plaintiffs”). Plaintiffs assert that Frito-Lay violated the Pennsylvania Minimum Wage Act of 1968 (“PMWA”), as amended, 43 Pa.Stat.Ann. §§ 333.101…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- United States v. American Trucking AssociationsSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Alers v. City of PhiladelphiaDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2013
- Oddo v. Bimbo Bakeries U.S.A., Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2019
- Verderame v. Radioshack Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2014
- Foster v. Kraft Foods Global, Inc.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2012
- Chevalier v. General Nutrition Centers, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.