Legal Opinion

Dole v. Simpson

District Court, S.D. Indiana

Decided November 25, 1991No. IP 88-66CPublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ENTRY DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (FILED AS AN AMENDED MOTION TO DISMISS)

TINDER, District Judge.

The Secretary of Labor alleges that Defendant Jack B. Simpson failed to pay his employees minimum wages and overtime pay required by the Fair Labor Standards Act (the “Act” or “FLSA”). Responding that he is not the proper party liable for such a violation, the Defendant filed a Motion to Dismiss the claim. The sole issue raised here is whether the Defendant had the status of an “employer” under the Act when the alleged violations occurred.

For the reasons discussed below, the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Goldberg v. Whitaker House Cooperative, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
  3. Mitchell v. Lublin, McGaughy & AssociatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  4. Donovan v. AgnewCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1983
  5. Elizabeth Dole, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor v. Elliott Travel & Tours, Inc. And Jared SchubinerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Andrews v. Kowa Printing Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Villareal v. El Chile, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2011
  3. Morgan v. SPEAKEASY, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2007
  4. Freemon v. FoleyDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1995
  5. Solis v. A-1 Mortgage Corp.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2013

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API