Legal Opinion
Bell v. H.F. Cox, Inc.
California Court of Appeal
Decided September 5, 2012No. Nos. B229982, B233136PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
CROSKEY, Acting P. J.
Oscar Bell and other truck drivers filed a class action complaint against H.F. Cox, Inc. (Cox), alleging wage and hour violations.1 The trial court summarily adjudicated three counts in favor of Cox, a jury found in favor of Cox on another count and the trial court found that plaintiffs were exempt from federal overtime compensation requirements. Plaintiffs appeal the judgment challenging the order granting summary adjudication, the denial of their motion to exclude witnesses from testifying at trial, the court’s finding on the overtime exemption and the jury…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Shaw v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Arnold v. Ben Kanowsky, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Walling v. Jacksonville Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Soule v. General Motors Corp.California Supreme Court · 1994
- Massachusetts v. MorashSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Levin v. Caviar, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2015
- Nieto v. Fresno Beverage Co., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- Burch v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
- Blevin v. Coastal Surgical InstituteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
- 139 S. Occidental Blvd. v. Ha CA2/7California Court of Appeal · 2013
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.