Legal Opinion
City of Canby v. Rinkes
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided June 10, 1998No. 90-08-180 and 90-08-381 CA A95505PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtArmstrong, J.
Michael and Janet Rinkes appeal from an amended supplemental judgment that was entered in a consolidated case. The consolidated case consists of an action by the City of Canby to condemn a parcel of property owned by the Rinkeses and an action by the Rinkeses against the city for its alleged breach of a lease on a portion of the property. The city cross-appeals. We affirm on the appeal and reverse on the cross-appeal.
The facts and procedural history of this case are outlined in detail in City of Canby v. Rinkes, 136 Or App 602, 902 P2d 605 (1995), rev den 322 Or 489 (1996). We will summarize…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Far West Landscaping, Inc. v. Pacific Cascade Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1979
- Matter of Marriage of VinsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
- Stevenson v. United States National BankOregon Supreme Court · 1984
- City of Canby v. RinkesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
- Condliff v. PriestCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. G. N.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
- Ramis Crew Corrigan & Bachrach, LLP v. StoelkCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
- In the Matter of GnCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
- Iron Horse Engineering Co. v. Northwest Rubber Extruders, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
- Iron Horse Engineering Co. v. Northwest Rubber Extruders, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2004