Legal Opinion

Ramis Crew Corrigan & Bachrach, LLP v. Stoelk

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided June 9, 2004No. CCV0205809; A122808PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrewer, P. J.

After defendants filed their notice of appeal from a judgment, the trial court entered an amended judgment. Thereafter, plaintiff Ramis Crew Corrigan & Bachrach, LLP (Ramis Crew) cross-appealed from the original judgment and plaintiffs Ramis Crew and Hibbard Caldwell & Schultz, P.C., appealed from the amended judgment.1 This court issued an order to show cause, requesting that plaintiffs demonstrate the reason that their appeal from the amended judgment should not be dismissed on the ground that the filing of the notice of appeal from the original judgment had terminated the trial court’s…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Miller v. Water Wonderland Improvement DistrictOregon Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Merry Queen Transfer Corp. v. O'RourkeDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1967
  3. Matter of Marriage of MullinaxOregon Supreme Court · 1982
  4. State Highway Commission v. DeLong Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Hubbard v. HubbardOregon Supreme Court · 1958

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Reaser v. ReaserSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Hill v. HillCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2022
  3. In Re the Marriage of FrostCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
  4. Fitzgerald v. Rogue Agrisource LLCCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2024
  5. Fitzgerald v. Rogue Agrisource LLCCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2024

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API