Legal Opinion
City of Canby v. Rinkes
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided September 13, 1995No. 90-08-180 and 90-08-381 CA A79940PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtArmstrong, J.
Michael and Janet Rinkes appeal from a supplemental judgment entered in a consolidated case. The consolidated case consists of an action by the City of Canby to condemn a parcel of property owned by the Rinkeses, and an action by the Rinkeses to enjoin the city from condemning the property and to obtain specific performance and damages for the city’s alleged breach of a lease of a portion of it. The supplemental judgment condemned approximately 14 acres of the Rinkeses’ property, and awarded the Rinkeses damages and attorney fees on the condemnation and lease claims. The judgment was based,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- David M. Scott Construction Corp. v. FarrellOregon Supreme Court · 1979
- Harty v. ByeOregon Supreme Court · 1971
- Real Estate Loan Fund Oreg. Ltd. v. HevnerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
- Davis v. BrownOregon Supreme Court · 1977
- Walcutt v. Inform Graphics, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Perez-Denison v. Kaiser Foundation Health Plan of NorthwestDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2012
- Pierre Arboireau and Sandrine Arboireau v. Adidas-Salomon Ag, a Foreign Corporation and Adidas America, Inc., a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Newton/Boldt v. NewtonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
- David Koepping v. Tri-County Metropolitan Transportation District of Oregon Jerry WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- City of Canby v. RinkesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.