Iron Horse Engineering Co. v. Northwest Rubber Extruders, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1ConcurrenceBarron, J.
I agree with the majority’s resolution of Northwest’s first, third, and fourth assignments of error. In its second assignment of error, Northwest argues that the trial judge provided “a legally incorrect answer to the jury’s written question during deliberations without first notifying counsel.” Iron Horse argues that the error is not preserved,1 but the majority finds it unnecessary to address the preservation issue because it finds harmless error based on State v. White, 55 Or App 729, 639 P2d 1291 (1982).2 Although I agree with the majority that the error was harmless based on the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Oien v. BourassaOregon Supreme Court · 1960
- Ruckman v. OrmondOregon Supreme Court · 1902
- Huntley v. ReedOregon Supreme Court · 1976
- Grammer v. Wiggins-Meyer Steamship Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1928
- Beall Transport Equipment Co. v. Southern Pacific TransportationCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.