Legal Opinion

Petersen v. Fielder

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided October 4, 2000No. 16-98-11043; CA A106971PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrewer, J.

Defendants appeal from a supplemental judgment awarding attorney fees to plaintiffs. Plaintiffs have moved to dismiss the appeal on the ground that defendants did not appeal from an earlier judgment that awarded plaintiffs costs and that determined plaintiffs’ entitlement to attorney fees without fixing the amount of the fees. Defendants have, in turn, moved to give the trial court leave to enter an appeal-able judgment. We deny plaintiffs’ motion to dismiss and, by separate order, grant defendants’ motion to give the trial court leave to enter an appealable judgment.

This dispute arose from…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Propp v. LongOregon Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Frederickson v. DitmoreCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
  3. National Mortgage Co. v. Robert C. Wyatt, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
  4. Lairmore v. Drake and BoroughOregon Supreme Court · 1948
  5. Lee v. Oregon Racing CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. LDS Development, LLC v. City of EugeneCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
  2. Burke v. State Ex Rel. Department of Land Conservation & DevelopmentCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
  3. Lehman v. BielenbergCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
  4. Petersen v. FielderCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
  5. Mathews v. HutchcraftCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API