Legal Opinion

Frederickson v. Ditmore

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided January 4, 1995No. CV2-0077-16; CA A82188 (Control); CV2-0091-16; CA A82189PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHaselton, J.

Defendant appeals from the trial court’s supplemental judgment denying his request for attorney fees. We reverse and remand.

Plaintiffs Frederickson and DCR Corporation, in separate actions that were ultimately consolidated, sought to terminate defendant’s tenancy pursuant to ORS 90.400, the landlord remedies of Oregon’s Residential Landlord Tenant Act (RLTA), and ORS 105.105 through ORS 105.168, Oregon’s forcible entry and detainer provisions. Defendant raised counterclaims in both actions, seeking, inter alia, “prevailing party” attorney fees under the RLTA, ORS 90.255. Before trial,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Murray v. MeyerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
  2. Walker v. GroteCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Petersen v. FielderCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
  2. Chase v. VernamCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
  3. National Mortgage Co. v. Robert C. Wyatt, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
  4. In re the Marriage of GintherCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
  5. CIT GROUP/EQUIPMENT FINANCING, INC. v. KendallCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API