Legal Opinion

Ford v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided September 23, 1985No. 83-1107PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BELSON, Associate Judge:

Appellant seeks review of her conviction, after a bench trial, of sexual solicitation, D.C.Code § 22-2701 (1984 Supp.), contending that the evidence was insufficient to support the conviction and that the statute is unconstitutionally vague. We hold that the evidence adduced was sufficient for conviction and the statute is not unconstitutionally vague.

I

Two police officers seated in an unmarked parked car at the corner of 14th and L Streets, N.W., observed appellant on April 29,1983. At approximately 2:30 a.m., appellant and another woman exited a pickup truck driven by…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Kolender v. LawsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Thornhill v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  4. United States v. HarrissSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  5. Parker v. LevySupreme Court of the United States · 1974

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Mihas v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
  2. Dickerson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1994
  3. Jones v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993
  4. Ford v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
  5. Graves v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1986

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API