Graves v. United States
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
FERREN, Associate Judge:
After a bench trial, the court convicted appellants of “inviting for purposes of prostitution.” D.C. Code § 22-2701 (1985 Supp.) Appellants contend (1) this statute is unconstitutionally vague on its face and as applied, (2) the trial court improperly admitted evidence of appellants’ prior convictions for sexual solicitation, and (3) the evidence was insufficient to prove guilt. 1 We conclude the trial court abused its discretion by admitting such “other crimes” evidence in the government’s case-in-chief. We also conclude the evidence was insufficient for conviction.…
2Cases cited53 opinions
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Burks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Kolender v. LawsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Brown v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- United States v. Orange Jell BeechumCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Thompson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1988
- Ali v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
- German v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
- Roper v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1989
- Ford v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.