Legal Opinion
Ford v. United States
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided November 5, 1987No. 83-1105, 83-1108, 83-1106, 83-1109 and 85-1017PublishedCited by 38 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ON REHEARING EN BANC
Before PRYOR, Chief Judge, MACK, NEWMAN, FERREN, BELSON, TERRY, ROGERS, and STEADMAN, Associate Judges, and NEBEKER, Associate Judge, Retired.* TERRY, Associate Judge:
In each of these consolidated cases, the appellant was convicted of what is commonly known as soliciting for prostitution under D.C. Code § 22-2701 (1985 Supp.).1 The principal issue in all five appeals is whether the evidence was sufficient to support the appellants’ convictions. The Ford and Koluder cases were submitted without argument before a division of this court. While they were pending, the Blair…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Burks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Dandridge v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Robinson v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Richardson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- District of Columbia v. ColemanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995
- Rose v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993
- Moody v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2007
- State v. FieldsHawaii Supreme Court · 2007
- Gonzalez v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1997
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.