Legal Opinion

Dickerson v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided November 29, 1994No. 90-CF-850PublishedCited by 47 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WAGNER, Chief Judge:

Appellant, Bertrand D. Dickerson, was convicted following a jury trial of possession of a controlled substance (cocaine) with intent to distribute in violation of D.C.Code § 33-541(a)(l) (1981 ed.) (Repl.1993). He argues for reversal on the grounds that: (1) the evidence was insufficient to convict him; (2) the trial court erred in instructing the jury on aiding and abetting; and (3) he was denied the right to a speedy trial. We affirm.

I

According to the evidence presented by the government, on May 3, 1988, at about 5:00 p.m., on the corner of 18th Place and D Street, N.E.,…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. United States v. MacDonaldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. United States v. Loud HawkSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Curry v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
  5. United States v. Bobby StatenCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1978

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. Gibson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2002
  2. Hammond v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2005
  3. Jeffrey v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2006
  4. Robinson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007
  5. Ball v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2002

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API