Legal Opinion
Jones v. United States
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided May 13, 1993No. 90-CF-947, 90-CF-983PublishedCited by 45 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SULLIVAN, Associate Judge:
Appellants, James E. Butler and George Marshall Jones, were each charged in indictments with assault with intent to kill while armed in violation of D.C.Code §§ 22-501, -3202 (1989). A jury convicted Butler of the indicted offense and convicted Jones of the lesser-included offense of assault with a dangerous weapon in violation of D.C.Code § 22-502 (1989). In these consolidated appeals, appellants raise two principal issues. First, we consider whether the trial court abused its discretion by admitting excessive evidence and allowing argument by government counsel…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Burks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Nathan L. Drew v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1964
- Irick v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1989
- John L. Bailey v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1969
- Punch v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1977
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by45 opinions
- Johnson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1996
- State of Iowa v. Vernon Lee HuserSupreme Court of Iowa · 2017
- Dickerson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1994
- Taylor v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995
- Peterson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.