Dieterle v. Yellow Cab Co.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
In the evening of December 9, 1937, plaintiffs were passengers in a taxicab driven by defendant Nave and owned by defendant corporation, which collided with a Plymouth automobile driven by defendant La Force. They seek to recover damages for injuries received in the collision. Defendant Agnes Whelan was made a defendant under allegations that she was the owner of the Plymouth ear. When both sides rested the trial court granted a motion for a directed verdict as to defendant Nave and the taxicab company. The jury returned verdicts in favor of defendant Whelan and against defendant La…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Scarborough v. UrgoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
- Mairo v. Yellow Cab Co. of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
- St. Clair v. McAlisterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
3Cited by13 opinions
- Nichols v. City of PhoenixArizona Supreme Court · 1949
- McClinton v. RiceArizona Supreme Court · 1953
- City of Phoenix v. BrownArizona Supreme Court · 1960
- Barker v. General Petroleum Corp.Arizona Supreme Court · 1951
- Drane v. AveryArizona Supreme Court · 1951
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.