Legal Opinion

Dieterle v. Yellow Cab Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 11, 1939No. Civ. 12219PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

In the evening of December 9, 1937, plaintiffs were passengers in a taxicab driven by defendant Nave and owned by defendant corporation, which collided with a Plymouth automobile driven by defendant La Force. They seek to recover damages for injuries received in the collision. Defendant Agnes Whelan was made a defendant under allegations that she was the owner of the Plymouth ear. When both sides rested the trial court granted a motion for a directed verdict as to defendant Nave and the taxicab company. The jury returned verdicts in favor of defendant Whelan and against defendant La…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Scarborough v. UrgoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Mairo v. Yellow Cab Co. of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
  3. St. Clair v. McAlisterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Nichols v. City of PhoenixArizona Supreme Court · 1949
  2. McClinton v. RiceArizona Supreme Court · 1953
  3. City of Phoenix v. BrownArizona Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Barker v. General Petroleum Corp.Arizona Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Drane v. AveryArizona Supreme Court · 1951

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API