Marshburn v. AssociatEd Indemnity Corp.
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
MARTIN, Judge.
The primary question presented by the parties to this appeal is whether plaintiffs’ action to recover additional damages allegedly caused by the lightning is barred because it was not brought within the time provided by the insurance policy and by the applicable statute of limitations. We conclude that the action is barred and, for the reasons hereinafter stated, affirm the order of the trial court granting summary judgment for defendant.
Summary judgment is appropriate only when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Kessing v. National Mortgage CorporationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
- Johnson v. Phoenix Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
- Kidd v. EarlySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
- Pembee Mfg. Corp. v. Cape Fear Const. Co., Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
- North Carolina State Ports Authority v. Lloyd A. Fry Roofing Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Murray v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1996
- Williams v. Blue Cross Blue Shield of NCSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2003
- First Investors Corp. v. Citizens Bank, Inc.District Court, W.D. North Carolina · 1991
- Skyline Restoration, Inc. v. Church Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2021
- Baucom's Nursery v. Mecklenburg CountyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.