Neal v. Craig Brown, Inc.
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
MARTIN, Judge.
Plaintiff assigns error to the entry of summary judgment dismissing his claims against defendants. He contends that genuine issues of material fact exist with respect to the nature of his tenancy in defendants’ property. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
Summary judgment is appropriate only when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Kessing v. National Mortgage Corp., 278 N.C. 523, 180 S.E. 2d 823 (1971). The burden of establishing the lack of any triable issue of material fact is on the party moving…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Kessing v. National Mortgage CorporationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
- Kidd v. EarlySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
- Bernick v. JurdenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
- Little v. National Service Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
- Texaco, Inc. v. CreelSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Di Frega v. PuglieseCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004
- Hooper v. Pizzagalli Construction Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993
- Barker v. AgeeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1989
- American Community Stores Corp. v. NewmanNebraska Supreme Court · 1989
- Hilton Head Air Service, Inc. v. Beaufort CountyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1992
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.