Legal Opinion

Dull v. Mutual of Omaha Insurance Co.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided April 21, 1987No. 8621SC1022PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARTIN, Judge.

The issue to be decided in this appeal is whether defendants were entitled to summary judgment with respect to plaintiffs’ claims. Plaintiffs argue that summary judgment was improper, contending that the previous denial of defendants’ motions to dismiss plaintiffs’ claims pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) established “the law of the case” and precluded the subsequent entry of summary judgment dismissing those claims. In any event, they contend, genuine issues of material fact exist as to whether defendants have engaged in unfair and deceptive trade practices and have breached an implied…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Kessing v. National Mortgage CorporationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  2. Johnson v. Phoenix Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  3. Kidd v. EarlySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  4. Pearce v. American Defender Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  5. Federal Trade Commission v. Brown Shoe Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Melnick v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Tim Bartolomeo, D/B/A Quality Brands, Inc. v. S.B. Thomas, Inc. Cpc International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1989
  3. N.C. Steel, Inc. v. National Council on Compensation InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1998
  4. Tar Heel Industries, Inc. v. E. I. duPont De Nemours & Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988
  5. Precision Components, Inc. v. C.W. Bearing USA, Inc.District Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2008

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API