Wood v. Smith
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Wayne; Rohnert, J. Assumpsit by Ira L. Wood against Joseph N. Smith for commissions on the sale of real estate. A judgment for defendant is reviewed by plaintiff on writ of error.
1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.
This is an action of assumpsit to recover a commission claimed to be due the plaintiff upon a sale of real estate alleged to have been brought about by him for the defendant. The case was submitted to the jury, and the defendant had a verdict. The plaintiff brings error. The assignments of error are based upon the exclusion of testimony, the refusal to give plaintiff’s requests to charge, and upon the charge as given; but the meritorious question is whether the plaintiff was the procuring cause of the sale to one Mrs. Moore, the purchaser.
The plaintiff, a real estate broker, testified that,…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Antisdel v. CanfieldMichigan Supreme Court · 1899
- Heaton v. EdwardsMichigan Supreme Court · 1892
- McGovern v. BennettMichigan Supreme Court · 1906
- Douville v. ComstockMichigan Supreme Court · 1896
- Brooks v. LeathersMichigan Supreme Court · 1897
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- National Airlines, Inc. v. Oscar E. Dooly Associates, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1964
- Leadville Mining Co. v. HemphillArizona Supreme Court · 1915
- Wheelan v. HuntSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- Gilmore v. BolioMichigan Supreme Court · 1911
- Stacey v. Whalen Et Ux.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1928
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.