Leadville Mining Co. v. Hemphill
Arizona Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of tlie Superior Court of the County of Cochise. J. E. O’Connor, Judge.
1Opinion of the CourtFranklin, J.
On or about October 22, 1912, the appellant, Leadville Mining Company, who was defendant below, by its agreement gave an option to one Apollos Puller to purchase its property situate in the Turquoise mining district, Cochise county, Arizona, and the said Puller having paid to appellant on account of said option some $30,000, the appellee, as plaintiff, brought this action to recover compensation for his services in the matter. The plaintiff’s right to remuneration must necessarily arise by reason of a contract therefor, either express or implied. We must note with care this agreeement, if…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Stewart v. MatherWisconsin Supreme Court · 1873
- Whitcomb v. BaconMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1898
- French v. McKayMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1902
- Garver v. ThomanArizona Supreme Court · 1913
- Ward v. FletcherMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1878
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Young Mines Co., Ltd. v. Citizens' State Bk.Arizona Supreme Court · 1931
- Central Copper Co. v. KlefischArizona Supreme Court · 1928
- Haymes v. RogersArizona Supreme Court · 1950
- Durazo v. AyersArizona Supreme Court · 1920
- Arnold v. RoupSupreme Court of Colorado · 1916
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.