Antisdel v. Canfield
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Kent; Grove, J. Assumpsit by Arthur It. Antisdel against John Can-field for commissions on the sale of land. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.
The plaintiff recovered a judgment against the defendant for commissions, to which he claims he was entitled upon a sale of pine land made to the Thayer Lumber Company. The defendant brought the case here by writ of error.
Some correspondence was had between the parties in relation to the sale of a large tract of land in which Mr. Canfield had an interest. It is claimed by plaintiff that in August, 1895, an arrangement was made by which the plaintiff was to have a commission of $20,000, and that the conditions had occurred which entitled him to his *230commission. Mr. Canfield denied in the most…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Sibbald v. . the Bethlehem Iron CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
- Wylie v. . Marine National BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
- Babcock v. MerrittColorado Court of Appeals · 1891
- Douville v. ComstockMichigan Supreme Court · 1896
- Thuner v. KanterMichigan Supreme Court · 1894
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- LaForce v. Washington UniversityMissouri Court of Appeals · 1904
- Wood v. SmithMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
- Ball v. DolanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1908
- Craib v. Committee on National Missions of the Presbytery of Detroit of the United Presbyterian Church, U.S.A.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1975
- Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1980
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.