Legal Opinion

Brooks v. Leathers

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 27, 1897PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Error to superior court of Grand Rapids; Burlingame, J. Assmnpsit by James F. Brooks against Don J. Leathers for commissions on the sale of real estate. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.

This is an action to recover commission on a sale of real estate of which defendant was half owner. It appeared by the testimony offered on the part of the plaintiff that prior to July 18, 1893, plaintiff had been acting as agent for defendant, and that on that date defendant addressed him a note as follows:

“James F. Brooks, Esq.
“Dear Sir: Inasmuch as there are no prospects of closing a sale through you, to any of your customers, of our Ionia-street property, Mrs. Hastings and myself have given the option for a time to other parties, for the price of $31,000. We thought best to notify you, so…

2Cited by12 opinions

  1. Sessions v. Pacific Improvement Co.California Court of Appeal · 1922
  2. Wood v. SmithMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Pittelkow v. Jefferson Park Land Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Colonial Trust Co. v. Pacific Packing & Navigation Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1907
  5. Decker v. WiddicombMichigan Supreme Court · 1904

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API