Legal Opinion

Donovan v. Hibernia Savings & Loan Society

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 30, 1928No. Docket No. 6235PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PARKER, J., pro tem.

This action involves a sum of money deposited with defendant bank by Edward O’Kane. The defendant Hibernia Savings & Loan Society, a corporation, admits holding the amount, but sets up the fact that there is a dispute as to the ownership thereof. The attitude of the bank is simply that of a stakeholder awaiting the final determination of ownership, and it avers its willingness to pay the money to whomsoever the court may award it. The real controversy is between plaintiff, who claims the money by reason of a gift made to him by Edward O’Kane, and the defendant Hynes, the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Ridden v. . ThrallNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
  2. Brigham v. HughsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Daniel v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883
  4. Scheffer v. Erie County Savings BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1920
  5. Sullivan v. SheaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1916

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Ornbaun v. First National Bank of CloverdaleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  2. White v. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  3. Barham v. KhouryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
  4. Braun v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Berl v. RosenbergCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API