Sullivan v. Shea
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco, and from an order denying a new trial. George E. Crothers, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtKerrigan, J.
This is an action brought by Hannah Sullivan, as administratrix of the estate of James J. Sullivan, deceased, against Timothy Shea upon a promissory note for one thousand dollars, money alleged to have _ been borrowed by Shea from Sullivan in his lifetime. The complaint, alleging that the promissory note had been lost, set forth its terms, and the answer admitted the execution of the note substantially in the terms set forth.
In the year 1910 the deceased loaned to the defendant the sum of one thousand dollars, without taking therefor a note, receipt, or other evidence of the transaction.…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Beaver v. . BeaverNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
- Whalen v. MilhollandCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1899
- Denigan v. Hibernia Savings & Loan SocietyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Gardner v. GardnerCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1839
- Knight v. TrippCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Botchford v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1936
- Mutual Benefit Life Insurance v. ClarkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
- McNabb v. FisherArizona Supreme Court · 1931
- Henson v. HensonTennessee Supreme Court · 1924
- MacFarlane v. FarwellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.