Legal Opinion

Berl v. Rosenberg

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 26, 1959No. Civ. 18109PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPeters, P. J.

Plaintiffs, partners, are security brokers. One Melville C. Rosenberg, under the terms of a written contract, engaged plaintiffs to act as his broker. In the regular course of business plaintiffs came into possession and held in Melville C. Rosenberg’s account certain securities. Melville committed suicide by taking morphine sulphate. With the consent of all concerned plaintiffs sold the securities, deriving $8,003.68 from the sale. The three defendants claimed the fund. Plaintiffs interpleaded the three claimants. The trial court determined that defendant Marion Clemens was entitled to the…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Kennedy v. McMurrayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Moore v. TrottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Knight v. TrippCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  4. California Trust Co. v. BennettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  5. Cordano v. WrightCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. United States v. Alcaraz-GarciaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
  2. Yamaha Corp. of America v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
  3. In Re Marriage of StephensonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
  4. Cordasco v. ScaleroCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
  5. Scherer v. HylandSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1977

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API