Barham v. Khoury
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtMoore, P. J.
The question for decision is whether the court below was required to find the facts as given in the uncontradicted testimony of appellant, Khoury, or did it act in a lawful exercise of the judicial function in inferring from the circumstances of the alleged gift and the history of that appellant’s relationship to the donor that there was no gift in view of death.
Prior to her decease, July 1, 1945, and at all times subsequent to June, 1940, decedent Maggie George resided in her comfortable home in the city of Beverly Hills. Her husband having accumulated a competency departed this life prior…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Estate of Bristol v. YoungCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Grymes v. . HoneNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
- Knight v. TrippCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Hynes v. WhiteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
- Mutual Benefit Life Insurance v. ClarkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Dillard v. McKnightCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
- Odone v. MarzocchiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
- Khoury v. BarhamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
- Fowler v. Security-First National BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
- Zimmerman v. FawkesIdaho Supreme Court · 1950
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.