Daniel v. Smith
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco, and from an order refusing a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtThornton, J.
This action was brought to recover of the Hibernia Savings and Loan Society a sum of money specified in the complaint. A claim to this money was set up by Holland Smith, as the administrator of the estate of Abraham Fielding, deceased, and he was made a defendant that the validity of his claim as against the plaintiffs might be determined. Judgment was rendered for the plaintiffs, and Smith moved for a new trial, which was denied, thereupon Smith appealed from the judgment and order denying a new trial.
The sole question to be determined is whether the money sued for was given to Emma Daniel,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Taylor v. HenryCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1878
- Curry v. . PowersNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
- Hatch v. AtkinsonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1868
- McGrath v. ReynoldsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1875
- Huntington v. GilmoreNew York Supreme Court · 1852
3Cited by21 opinions
- Hatcher v. BufordSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1895
- Hart v. KetchumCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Mutual Benefit Life Insurance v. ClarkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
- Dahlgren v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1908
- Beebe v. CoffinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.