Hudson Manhattan R.R. Co. v. . Wendel
New York Court of Appeals
Cross-appeals from, an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered December- 6, 1907, which modified and affirmed as modified an interlocutory judgment entered upon the report of a referee adjudging that condemnation of the defendant’s property is necessary for the public use specified in the petition, and affirmed as modified an order confirming the report of commissioners appointed to ascertain the compensation to be paid…
Read the full summary
Cross-appeals from, an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered December- 6, 1907, which modified and affirmed as modified an interlocutory judgment entered upon the report of a referee adjudging that condemnation of the defendant’s property is necessary for the public use specified in the petition, and affirmed as modified an order confirming the report of commissioners appointed to ascertain the compensation to be paid for said property. The appeal on behalf of the plaintiff is from so much of the order of the Appellate Division as…
1Opinion of the CourtChase, J.
The Hudson and Manhattan Bailroad Company was organized for the purpose of constructing and operating a tunnel railroad in the city of Hew York to be connected with a railroad or railroads within the state of Hew Jersey, and thereby forming a continuous line for the carriage of passengers and property between a point or points within and a point or points without the city of Hew York. Thereafter the petition herein was filed for the purpose of acquiring by condemnation certain real property in the city of Hew York including the property owned by the defendant Wendel, known as Ho. 40 Dey…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Story v. . New York Elevated R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1882
- Brooklyn Park Commissioners v. ArmstrongNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
- Rexford v. . KnightNew York Court of Appeals · 1854
- Roby v. . N.Y.C. H.R.R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1894
- In Re N.Y. and H.R.R. Co. v. . KipNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Neitzel v. Spokane International Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1911
- Crouch v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1926
- O & W Lines, Inc. v. St. JohnNew York Court of Appeals · 1967
- In re the City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1954
- People v. HelinskiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.