Neitzel v. Spokane International Railway Co.
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Spokane county, Kennan, J., entered March IT, 1910, upon sustaining a demurrer to the complaint, in an action to recover real property, and for damages.
1Opinion of the CourtChow, J.
— This action was commenced by A. Neitzel, Joe Neitzel, J. F. Thielmann and Hannah Thielmann, his wife, against Spokane International Railway Company, a corporation, and Benham & Griffith Company, a corporation, to recover lots 12 and IS, in block 4, of Riverfront addition to Spokane, and for damages. Plaintiffs elected to stand upon their complaint, to which a demurrer was interposed and sustained, and have appealed from a judgment of dismissal.
The complaint in substance alleges, that respondent Spokane International Railway Company, hereinafter mentioned as railway company, is a public…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Grand Trunk Railroad v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Hartford Fire Insurance v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1899
- Water Works Co. v. BurkhartIndiana Supreme Court · 1872
- Kansas Central Railway Co. v. AllenSupreme Court of Kansas · 1879
- Healy Lumber Co. v. MorrisWashington Supreme Court · 1903
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- State Ex. Rel. York v. B. of C. Com'rsWashington Supreme Court · 1947
- Brown v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1996
- HTK Management, L.L.C. v. Seattle Popular Monorail AuthorityWashington Supreme Court · 2005
- Htk Management v. Seattle Monorail Auth.Washington Supreme Court · 2005
- Smith v. CameronOregon Supreme Court · 1922
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.