Legal Opinion

In Re N.Y. and H.R.R. Co. v. . Kip

New York Court of Appeals

Decided November 28, 1871PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] That the land and premises, the title to which, the applicant seeks to acquire by these proceedings, are required for the purposes of the corporation is beyond dispute, as is also the fact that the corporation has been unable to agree for the purchase, by reason of the unwillingness or inability of the owners, the present…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Beekman v. Saratoga & Schenectady Rail RoadNew York Court of Chancery · 1831
  2. Rensselaer and Saratoga R.R. Co. v. . DavisNew York Court of Appeals · 1870
  3. Eldridge v. SmithSupreme Court of Vermont · 1861

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Varner v. MartinWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1883
  2. Burnquist v. CookSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1945
  3. Matter of City of New York (Ely Avenue)New York Court of Appeals · 1916
  4. Central Pacific Ry. Co. v. FeldmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
  5. Prather v. Jeffersonville, Madison & Indianapolis RailroadIndiana Supreme Court · 1875

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API