Legal Opinion
O & W Lines, Inc. v. St. John
New York Court of Appeals
Decided May 25, 1967PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBurke, J.
The parties herein have gone to great lengths to obtain judicial resolution of their controversy and, after the first attempt resulted in failure because of their inability to have the order of the Acting Trial Judge signed (O & W Lines v. St. John, 53 Misc 2d 792 [Sullivan County Ct., 1962]), this present action was commenced by submission to the Appellate Division on an agreed statement of facts pursuant to CPLR 3222.
For the sum of $1,700 Frederick M. St. John and Pluma E., his wife, conveyed 3% acres of land in what was then the Hamlet of Monticello to the Monticello and Port Jervis Rail…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Roby v. . N.Y.C. H.R.R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1894
- Crouch v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1926
- Hudson Manhattan R.R. Co. v. . WendelNew York Court of Appeals · 1908
- In re the City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1954
- O & W Lines, Inc. v. St. John, New York County Courts1962
3Cited by11 opinions
- People v. HelinskiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- Notelzah, Inc. v. DestivalSupreme Court of Iowa · 1992
- Somerset Railroad v. Owasco River Railway, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1987
- Vanderhoef v. DoeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Ellar Estates Corp. v. CohenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.