Legal Opinion

State v. Fields

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided November 14, 2001No. 01-1177-CRPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

¶ 1. In this criminal procedure case, we are asked to determine whether an information containing a repeater allegation without identifying a specific prior conviction complied with the statutory prerequisites of Wis. Stat. § 973.12(1) (1999-2000) 1 and due process. We agree with Vernon D. Fields that the pleadings in this case were insufficient to adequately allege a repeater enhancer under § 973.12(1). Nevertheless, we affirm the judgment and order of the trial court on the basis that the State's pre-plea submission of a certified copy of prior convictions constituted an amendment to the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. MartinWisconsin Supreme Court · 1991
  2. State v. GerardWisconsin Supreme Court · 1995
  3. State v. GoldsteinCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1994
  4. State v. CampbellCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1996
  5. State v. LiebnitzWisconsin Supreme Court · 1999

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. BondsWisconsin Supreme Court · 2006
  2. State v. WatsonCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2002
  3. State v. BondsWisconsin Supreme Court · 2006
  4. State v. BondsWisconsin Supreme Court · 2006
  5. State v. RoblesCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API