Legal Opinion

State v. Gerard

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided January 18, 1995No. 93-1010-CRPublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HEFFERNAN, CHIEF JUSTICE.

This review of a published decision of the court of appeals, 1 raises a single issue: whether a criminal information which asserts a repeater allegation under sec. 973.12(1), Stats., 2 can be amended, after the defendant has pleaded to the charges, to correct the number of years by which the sentence would be enhanced. The circuit court denied Gerard's request to strike the incorrect penalty enhancement 3 allegation and granted the state's request to amend. The court of appeals reversed that portion of the judgment which imposed an enhanced sentence on the obstructing…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. MartinWisconsin Supreme Court · 1991
  2. State v. WickstromCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1984
  3. Whitaker v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
  4. City of Muskego v. GodecWisconsin Supreme Court · 1992
  5. State v. TrammelCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1987

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. State v. DerangoWisconsin Supreme Court · 2000
  2. State v. WidemanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1996
  3. State v. BondsWisconsin Supreme Court · 2006
  4. State v. LongWisconsin Supreme Court · 2009
  5. State v. DeRangoCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1999

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API