Legal Opinion

State v. Campbell

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided April 25, 1996No. 95-2217-CRPublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtVergeront, J.

Carlton Campbell appeals from a judgment of conviction for bail jumping as a repeater, in violation of §§ 946.49(l)(a) and 939.62(l)(a), Stats. He contends the trial court erred in permitting the State to amend the information after arraignment to add a fourth misdemeanor to the three already alleged as a predicate for the repeater charge. Campbell claims the amendment violated § 973.12(1), Stats., because it was made after the trial court accepted his plea of not guilty at arraignment. We conclude the amendment did not violate § 973.12(1). We also conclude that Campbell was not prejudiced by…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. MartinWisconsin Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Tahtinen v. MSI InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1985
  3. State v. GerardWisconsin Supreme Court · 1995
  4. State v. WilksCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1991
  5. State v. KircherCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1994

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. SaundersWisconsin Supreme Court · 2002
  2. State v. BondsWisconsin Supreme Court · 2006
  3. L.L.N. v. ClauderCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1996
  4. State v. FieldsCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2001
  5. State v. ThomsCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1999

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API