Legal Opinion

State v. Robles

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided May 1, 2013No. 2012AP307-CRPublished

1Opinion of the CourtGundrum, J.

¶ 1. This case requires us to decide whether a circuit court accepting a plea is required to specifically inform the defendant that the charge to which he or she is pleading is a "felony" or "misdemeanor." We conclude it is not and affirm.

BACKGROUND

¶ 2. Nely Robles pled to and was found guilty of felony identity theft, as a party to the crime. Prior to *327accepting Robles' plea, the circuit court engaged in a plea colloquy with Robles that she concedes was sufficient in all relevant respects except that the court neglected to use the word "felony." Robles filed a post-conviction motion to…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. BangertWisconsin Supreme Court · 1986
  2. State v. BrownWisconsin Supreme Court · 2006
  3. State v. DenterWisconsin Supreme Court · 1984
  4. State v. HowellWisconsin Supreme Court · 2007
  5. State v. CecchiniWisconsin Supreme Court · 1985

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API