Legal Opinion
Kinslow Round-Up Inc. v. City of Seminole
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided July 6, 2004No. 98,038PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPALA, V.C.J.
1 The dispositive issue tendered on cer-tiorari is whether summary relief for the City was erroneously entered. We answer in the affirmative.
I
THE ANATOMY OF LITIGATION
Ordinance 917
T2 On 6 December 1999 the City of Seminole (City) enacted Ordinance No. 917, whose terms annexed certain territory to its corporate limits. The territory consisted of several tracts of land along Highway 99 which were connected by a 3-foot-wide strip of land that touched the northern boundary of the city, extending perpendicularly several (7 to 10) miles (along the west side of the highway) to the I-40…
2Cases cited95 opinions
- Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- New York v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- City of Lafayette v. Louisiana Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Waller v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Hunter v. City of PittsburghSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
90 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- IN RE: INITIATIVE PETITION NO. 397, STATE QUESTION NO. 767Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2014
- IN RE: INITIATIVE PETITION NO. 397, STATE QUESTION NO. 767Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2014
- TOCH, LLC v. CITY OF TULSASupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2020
- Sherbert v. City of AdaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2015
- Fraternal Order of Police, Lodge 142 v. City of PerkinsCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2006
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.