Legal Opinion
City of Maud v. Tulsa Rig, Reel & Mfg. Co.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided October 3, 1933No. 21618PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtAndrews, J.
The record in this case shows that the trial court rendered judgment in an equity action against the plaintiffs in error, the defendants in the trial court, on Saturday, December 14, 1929; that on Monday, December 16, 1929, one of their attorneys deposited a motion for new trial in the United States mail at Oklahoma City, properly addressed to the court clerk with the necessary postage thereon, for transmission to the court clerk by registered mail; that that motion was received at the post office of the addressee at some time on December IT, 1929, and that it was delivered by those postal…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- City of Topeka v. DwyerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1904
- Morrow v. Barber Asphalt Paving Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
- Barton v. StuckeySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
- City of Blackwell v. City of NewkirkSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- City of Muskogee v. NicholsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- MacY v. Oklahoma City School District No. 89Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1998
- Town of Luther v. State Ex Rel. HarrodSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1967
- Missouri-Kansas-Texas R. Co. v. MaltsbergerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1941
- Peerless Realty & Operating Co. v. City of TulsaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
- Inland Development Co. v. Oklahoma CityDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1934
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.