Chickasha Cotton Oil Co. v. Rogers
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the CourtAndrews, J.
This is an appeal from a judgment of the district court of Kiowa county. The parties appear in the same order in which they appeared in the trial court. The action was to recover a money judgment for the amount of excessive taxes paid for the year 1928. The trial court rendered judgment sustaining a demurrer to the plaintiff’s evidence.
The record discloses that the plaintiff owned 40 acres of land near the city of Hobart upon which there was located a cotton oil mill. During the year 1928 a portion of the property was levied upon as being within the city of Hobart. The defendant contends that…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Barton v. StuckeySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
- Biggerstaff v. City of AltusSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
- Daniel v. StuckySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
3Cited by14 opinions
- East Central Oklahoma Electric Cooperative, Inc. v. Oklahoma Gas & Electric Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1973
- Kruesel v. CollinWashington Supreme Court · 1933
- Alice H. Botsford and J. R. Goodwin v. The City of Norman, Oklahoma, a Municipal OcrporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1965
- Town of Luther v. State Ex Rel. HarrodSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1967
- In Re Referendum Petition No. 1, Town of HaskellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.