Legal Opinion

Chickasha Cotton Oil Co. v. Rogers

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 24, 1932No. 21482PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAndrews, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment of the district court of Kiowa county. The parties appear in the same order in which they appeared in the trial court. The action was to recover a money judgment for the amount of excessive taxes paid for the year 1928. The trial court rendered judgment sustaining a demurrer to the plaintiff’s evidence.

The record discloses that the plaintiff owned 40 acres of land near the city of Hobart upon which there was located a cotton oil mill. During the year 1928 a portion of the property was levied upon as being within the city of Hobart. The defendant contends that…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Barton v. StuckeySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
  2. Biggerstaff v. City of AltusSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
  3. Daniel v. StuckySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. East Central Oklahoma Electric Cooperative, Inc. v. Oklahoma Gas & Electric Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1973
  2. Kruesel v. CollinWashington Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Alice H. Botsford and J. R. Goodwin v. The City of Norman, Oklahoma, a Municipal OcrporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1965
  4. Town of Luther v. State Ex Rel. HarrodSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1967
  5. In Re Referendum Petition No. 1, Town of HaskellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API