Vanderflute v. Portland Railway, Light & Power Co.
Oregon Supreme Court
From Multnomah: W. N. Gatens, Judge. Department 2.
1Opinion of the CourtBubnett, C. J.
— This is an action against the Portland Bailway, Light & Power Company and George Wiener, to recover damages for personal injury suffered by the plaintiff, an employee of the defendant railway company. His duty in connection with another employee who was his foreman was to assist in testing the electric voltage of street-car tracks in the City of Portland! The foreman had a voltmeter which he attached to hydrants standing within the curb line near the street pavement, and it was the duty of the plaintiff to take a wire attached both to the voltmeter and to a stick about the size of an…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Washington v. B. & O. R. R.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1880
- Brown v. O.-W. R. & N. Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1912
- Chambers v. Everding & FarrellOregon Supreme Court · 1913
- Mackay v. Commission of PostOregon Supreme Court · 1915
- Poullos v. GroveOregon Supreme Court · 1917
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Ludwig v. ZidellOregon Supreme Court · 1941
- Jodoin v. Luckenbach S.S. Co., Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1928
- Smith v. Shevlin-Hixon Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1946
- Shevlin-Hixon Co. v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1947
- Warner v. SynnesOregon Supreme Court · 1924