Legal Opinion

Warner v. Synnes

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided October 9, 1924Published

1Opinion

On Rehearing.

(235 Pac. 305.)

For appellant there was a brief over the names of Messrs. Wilbur, Beckett & Howell and Mr. E. K. Oppenheimer, with an oral argument by Mr. H. B. Beckett.

For respondent there was a brief and oral argument by Mr. Bartlett Cole and Mr. George F. Alexander.

BURNETT, J.

Without citing any precedents in addition to those in his original brief, the plaintiff and respondent has filed a petition for rehearing, claiming that the court committed error in holding that there is no testimony to support the charge “that the lumber company was engaged in or had charge of the' repair…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Standard Oil Co. v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
  2. Washington v. B. & O. R. R.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1880
  3. Rorvik v. North Pac. Lumber Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1920
  4. Turnidge v. ThompsonOregon Supreme Court · 1918
  5. Warner v. SynnesOregon Supreme Court · 1924

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API