Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Ludwig v. Zidell

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided November 6, 1941PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKelly, C. J.

At the time plaintiff sustained the injury for which he seeks to recover, namely, on De cember 16,1939, he was, and for about three weeks had been, in the employment of defendants operating a machine known as the shears which consisted of two cutting blades approximately two feet long, powered by a gasoline motor and used in cutting scrap metal.

It is alleged in plaintiff’s complaint that—

“In connection with said machinery, defendants had and operated by power a certain knuckle revolving with an eccentric motion, so devised that it was extremely hazardous and dangerous to any person coming in…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Atchison, Topeka, & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. CalhounSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
  2. Brown v. O.-W. R. & N. Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1912
  3. State Ex Rel. Boeving v. CoxSupreme Court of Missouri · 1925
  4. Hill v. SaugestedOregon Supreme Court · 1908
  5. Fromme v. Lang & Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1929

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Varas v. Barco Manufacturing Co.California Court of Appeal · 1962
  2. Skeeters v. SkeetersOregon Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Southern Pacific Co. v. RaishCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1953
  4. Smith v. Shevlin-Hixon Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1946
  5. Califf v. NormanOregon Supreme Court · 1957

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API