Legal Opinion
Shevlin-Hixon Co. v. Smith
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided December 29, 1947No. 11567PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GARRECHT, Circuit Judge.
This is the second time that this case has been brought before this court on appeal. In the first appeal, the present appellee sought review of a judgment ordering that the present appellant’s motion for a directed verdict be sustained. We reversed the judgment of the lower court, and remanded the case for further proceedings. Smith v. Shevlin-Hixon Co., 9 Cir., 157 F.2d 51. For convenience and brevity, we will hereinafter refer to this earlier opinion as “the first case”.
The appellee asked for damages in the sum of $7,400, for injuries to her right knee suffered when…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- United States v. SilkSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Williams v. Mayor of BaltimoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Lillie v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Fredrick v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1947
- Bottig v. PolskyOregon Supreme Court · 1921
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Don Brown, Josef H. Miller and Allen L. McAlear v. Avemco Investment CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
- Richfield Oil Corporation v. Karseal CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1959
- Voohries-Larson v. Cessna Aircraft Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Don Brown, Josef H. Miller and Allen L. McAlear v. Avemco Investment CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
- Voohries-Larson v. Cessna Aircraft CoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001