Steel v. Yocum
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Rhodes, P. J.,
This ease involves an easement by prescription. Plaintiffs, by complaint in equity, sought to enjoin defendants from interfering with the use of a roadway or farm lane extending from a public higlnvay about two hundred feet over farm lands of defendants to plaintiffs’ land and a cottage located thereon. Plaintiffs’ claim to an easement is based on prescription or adverse use for over twenty-one years. Defendants’ answer alleged the use of the roadway or lane was by permission of the owners of the alleged servient estate. After hearing, the chancellor made findings of…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Becker v. RittenhouseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
- Garrett v. JacksonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1853
- Shinn v. RosenbergerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
- Pierce v. CloudSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1862
- Predwitch v. CHROBAK Et Ux.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Minteer v. WolfeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
- Morning Call, Inc. v. Bell Atlantic-Pennsylvania, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
- Wampler v. ShenkSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
- Stiegelman v. Pennsylvania Yacht Club, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
- Kaufer v. BeccarisSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.