Legal Opinion

Shinn v. Rosenberger

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 12, 1943No. Appeal, 114PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Me. Justice Patteeson,

This appeal arises out of a controversy over the use of a non-navigable lake for the purposes of boating, fishing and swimming.

Arthur T. Shinn and Lawrence D. Shinn are owners of a tract of land, comprising about 600 acres, in Middle Smithfield Township, Monroe County. This tract, on which is located thirty-nine fortieths of an entirely non-navigable lake, formerly known as “Seely’s Pond”, later as “Echo Lake”, has been operated by the Shinn family as a summer resort or bungalow colony continuously since 1909 or 1910. The remaining one-fortieth of the lake is…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Miller v. Lutheran Conference and Camp Ass'nSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  2. Pierce v. CloudSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1862
  3. Bennett v. BiddleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1891
  4. Carter v. Tinicum Fishing Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1875
  5. Gibbs v. SweetSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1902

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Keefer v. JonesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  2. Morning Call, Inc. v. Bell Atlantic-Pennsylvania, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  3. Shaffer v. Baylor's Lake Ass'nSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
  4. Fogle v. Malvern Courts, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  5. Farmers' Northern Market Co. v. GallagherSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1958

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API