Shinn v. Rosenberger
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Me. Justice Patteeson,
This appeal arises out of a controversy over the use of a non-navigable lake for the purposes of boating, fishing and swimming.
Arthur T. Shinn and Lawrence D. Shinn are owners of a tract of land, comprising about 600 acres, in Middle Smithfield Township, Monroe County. This tract, on which is located thirty-nine fortieths of an entirely non-navigable lake, formerly known as “Seely’s Pond”, later as “Echo Lake”, has been operated by the Shinn family as a summer resort or bungalow colony continuously since 1909 or 1910. The remaining one-fortieth of the lake is…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Miller v. Lutheran Conference and Camp Ass'nSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
- Pierce v. CloudSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1862
- Bennett v. BiddleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1891
- Carter v. Tinicum Fishing Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1875
- Gibbs v. SweetSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1902
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Keefer v. JonesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
- Morning Call, Inc. v. Bell Atlantic-Pennsylvania, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
- Shaffer v. Baylor's Lake Ass'nSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
- Fogle v. Malvern Courts, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
- Farmers' Northern Market Co. v. GallagherSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.