Legal Opinion

Morning Call, Inc. v. Bell Atlantic-Pennsylvania, Inc.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 10, 2000No. 2034 EDA 1999PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BECK, J.:

¶ 1 We address the legal interest in real property that Bell Atlantic Pennsylvania, Inc. (Bell) acquired from a landowner when it placed its equipment on a building in order to provide telephone service. We find that Bell acquired an irrevocable license and affirm the trial court.

¶2 The Morning Call, Inc. (The Call) owns two properties, at 106 and 114 N. Sixth Street in Allentown, Lehigh County, both of which it purchased in 1998. In 1917, Bell attached telephone equipment to the rear walls of these properties, in order to provide them, and adjoining rowhomes, with phone service. The…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Turnway Corporation v. SofferSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  2. Harkins v. ZamichieliSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  3. Huff v. McCauleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1866
  4. Baldwin v. TaylorSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1895
  5. Bodman v. BodmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. In Re Grand Jury Subpoenas 04-124-03 & 04-124-05Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
  2. Village of Four Seasons Ass'n v. Elk Mountain Ski Resort, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  3. Kapp v. Norfolk Southern Railway Co.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2004
  4. Commonwealth v. AndersonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  5. Blackburn v. LefebvreCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2007

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API