Spengler v. Worthington Cylinders
District Court, S.D. Ohio
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
MARBLEY, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
This matter comes before the Court on Defendant, Worthington Cylinders’ (“WC”) Motion to Dismiss Count II of Plaintiffs Complaint pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. For the reasons set forth herein, Defendant’s Motion is GRANTED.
II. STATEMENT OF FACTS 1
A. Background
Plaintiff, Jon Spengler (“Plaintiff’) is a fifty-four year old male residing in Ohio. Complaint ¶¶ 1, 5. Defendant WC (“Defendant”) is a company Ohio corporation with a production facility in Franklin County, Ohio, where the following events…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- In Re Delorean Motor Company, Debtor. David W. Allard, Jr. v. Howard L. Weitzman, an IndividualCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993
- Richard L. Windsor v. The TennesseanCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1984
- Gazette v. City of PontiacCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
- Morris v. Kaiser Engineers, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1984
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Spengler v. Worthington CylindersDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2007
- Esparza v. Pierre FoodsDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2013
- Flint v. Mercy Health PartnersDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2013
- Merhulik v. Weltman, Weinberg, & Reis Co., LPADistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2020