Legal Opinion
Esparza v. Pierre Foods
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided February 12, 2013No. Nos. 1:11-cv-874, 875-HJWPublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
HERMAN J. WEBER, Senior District Judge.
Pending is the defendant’s partial “Motion to Dismiss” (doc. no. 24 in Case No. l:ll-cv-874, Rosario Esparza, Sr. v. Pierre Foods) regarding four claims in the amended complaint. Also pending is the identical “Motion to Dismiss” filed in the companion case (doc. no. 25 in Case No. l:ll-ev-875, Consuelo Esparza v. Pierre Foods).1 The cases have been consolidated for purposes of discovery and pretrial matters. Plaintiffs oppose the motion, and defendant (“Pierre Foods”) has replied. Having fully considered the record, including the pleadings, the…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Miller v. CurrieCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1995
- Kathryn Keys v. Humana, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
- Roger Monette and Doris Monette v. Electronic Data Systems CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Flint v. Mercy Health PartnersDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2013
- Bold Home Products, LLC v. CarbonKlean, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2022
- Erika Kaback v. Quantum Health Inc., et al.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2026
- Lowrey v. RKT LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2022
- Merhulik v. Weltman, Weinberg, & Reis Co., LPADistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2020
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.