Morris v. Kaiser Engineers, Inc.
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtWilliam B. Brown, J.
The first issue presented by this case is whether Morris is precluded from filing a complaint under R.C. 4112.05, when she has already initiated an action pursuant to R.C. 4101.17, in order *46to comply with the mandatory prerequisite of the ADEA. Additionally, this court must determine the appropriate limitations period to be applied to R.C. 4101.17 age discrimination actions. For the reasons which follow, this court concludes that Morris is not precluded from filing her complaint with the Ohio Civil Rights Commission and that R.C. 2305.07 prescribes the correct statutory limitations period…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Oscar Mayer & Co. v. EvansSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- State v. Fremont Lodge of Loyal Order of MooseOhio Supreme Court · 1949
- Krenning v. Darling & Co.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1983
3Cited by37 opinions
- Kevin W. Ziegler v. Ibp Hog Market, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
- Montells v. HaynesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1993
- Kohmescher v. Kroger Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1991
- Cosgrove v. Williamsburg of Cincinnati Management Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1994
- Meyer v. United Parcel Service, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 2009
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.