Legal Opinion

Flint v. Mercy Health Partners

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided April 16, 2013No. Case No. 1:12-cv-826PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S PARTIAL MOTION TO DISMISS

SUSAN J. DLOTT, Chief Judge.

This matter is before the Court on Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs’ age discrimination claims brought under Ohio Revised Code Chapter 4112. Doc. 9. For the reasons that follow, the Court DENIES Defendant’s Motion.

I. BACKGROUND

Plaintiffs Diane Flint and Sarah Ann Hill are former employees of Defendant, Mercy Health Partners of Southwest Ohio (“Mercy”). Plaintiffs claim that Mercy discriminated against them on the basis of their age and race when it terminated their employment. Flint was sixty-four years old…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Oscar Mayer & Co. v. EvansSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Rmi Titanium Company v. Westinghouse Electric CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
  4. Lambert v. HartmanCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
  5. Carrier Corporation v. Outokumpu OyjCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Rozek v. Ampro Computers, Inc.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2014
  2. Blank v. Nationwide CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2020
  3. Dadosky v. Mid-America Conversion Services, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2024
  4. Nuritdinov v. Meda-Care Transportation Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API