Legal Opinion
Kortright v. Mutual Life Insurance
Nebraska Supreme Court
Decided August 11, 1932No. 28086PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Hastings, District Judge.
On January 16, 1917, the Mutual Life Insurance Company, appellant, and Willard I. Kortright, appellee, entered into a contract in writing whereby Kortright was appointed its agent for the purpose of soliciting insurance and collecting and remitting first year premiums thereon under the rules and regulations of the defendant company. For his services the defendant company agreed to pay him commissions on first year premiums secured and remitted by him in cash. The contract prohibited rebating in any form, directly or indirectly, by Kortright. Later, on December 30,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Milwaukee Mechanics' Ins. Co. v. WarrenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- National Union Fire Insurance v. NasonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1913
- People's State Bank v. SmithNebraska Supreme Court · 1930
- Ryder-Gougar Co. v. GarretsonWashington Supreme Court · 1909
- Hill v. Aetna Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1929
3Cited by4 opinions
- Ericson v. Nebraska-Iowa Farm Investment Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1938
- Sterling Colorado Agency, Inc., a Colorado Corporation v. Sterling Insurance Company, an Illinois Corporation, Sterling Insurance Company, an Illinois Corporation, Cross-Appellant v. Sterling Colorado Agency, Inc., a Colorado Corporation, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1959
- Sterling Colorado Agency, Inc. v. Sterling InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1959
- Aetna Life Insurance Co. of Hartford v. MoserWashington Supreme Court · 1937